Lithium and the Implications from
the Commercial Introduction of Electric Vehicles
Dr. Mark
Moskovitz and Gary Witman, MD
Much excitement in the motor
industry is being generated about electric cars
reaching the marketplace by the third quarter of
2010. The Chevy Volt with a travel distance of 40
miles per battery charge will be the first of these
commercially successful models. The vehicle will
come with an on board gas generator to recharge the
battery. The Volt’s charger has 2 modes: 6.5 hours
at 110 volts, and 3.2 hours at 220 volts. Similar
even further range vehicles from Nissan, Mercedes
and Volvo will be offered for sale during the coming
year. However, the Department of Transportation has
performed research indicating that 78% of all trips
are less than 40 miles, 85% are less than 50 miles,
and 93% are less than 70 miles.
This transformation from fuel
driven vehicles to battery power may meaningfully
alter the way that we lead our lives, reduce our
carbon burden and place additional demands upon the
electrical power grid. According to Austin Energy,
there is enough total combined electrical capacity
currently within the grid to allow overnight
charging for 160 million electric vehicles such as
the Volt. Of our entire oil consumption, some 2/3 of
it is for transportation and 44% of this oil
consumption can be replaced by battery generated
power. Our other transportation needs include
airplanes, trains, ships, and large trucks, none of
which will make the transition to battery power.
However for the passenger car the future seems to
afford a battery future.
The breakdown in our use of
petroleum for transportation needs is:
| Gasoline for
passenger vehicles |
44% |
| Diesel |
17% |
| Jet Fuel |
5% |
| Fuel oil for home
and industrial |
15% |
| Petrochemical,
plastics and fertilizer products |
19%
|
Lithium which will power our
battery needs is the 33rd most common mineral of the
earth’s crust and it is plentiful in nature as hard
rock ore and as brine. It has a density which is
half that of water, and is the least dense of all
solids, being a mere 0.53 grams/cm 3 at a
temperature of 20 C. Unlike the heavier alkalis,
lithium does not react violently with oxygen and is
stable in dry air. Cost efficient methods are being
explored for best extraction of this extraordinary
mineral. The richest lithium source currently being
harvested is the Salar de Atacama basin located in
the Atacama desert in Chile. Brine extraction has
become the preferred method of lithium extraction.
Lithium carbonate is produced
commercially from one of three sources:
-
Extraction from mineral
sources such as spodumene
-
Lithium containing brines –
commercially available lithium brines in the
United States are found in Silver Peak, Nevada
and Searles Lake, California.
-
Sea water extraction
The methods for large scale
lithium purification were developed by the
Chemetalle Foote Corporation of King Mountain, North
Carolina. Their strategy for reducing natural
resources to useful metal involves conversion of the
lithium salts to carbonate, then to chloride,
followed by molten salt electrolysis. The first
process used was obtaining pure lithium carbonate
from spodumene, or lithium aluminum silicate ore
(LiAlSi2O6). The ore is usually recovered from open
pit mines, and this process was exploited
commercially because of its relatively high lithium
content and ease of processing. Alpha spodumene,
which has a lithium oxide concentration of 5-7% is
able to be transformed to beta spodumene by heating
to over 1100 C, and then is extracted with sulfuric
acid to form lithium sulfate, treated with sodium
hydroxide and sodium carbonate to form sodium
sulfate (Glauber salt) and lithium carbonate. To
manufacture lithium chloride of high purity the
lithium carbonate is first transformed into lithium
hydroxide before chlorination to give battery grade
lithium chloride. This process is both time
consuming and is costly in large scale application.
Lithium brine is dried in a
series of solar evaporation ponds, and then removed
by precipitation using soda ash, which then is
transformed to lithium carbonate. The lithium rich
brine deposits such as the Salar de Atacama are
located in closed basins in high evaporation
environments where lithium is present as a chloride
or carbonate along with potassium and boron. Current
technology transforms impure lithium carbonate into
lithium hydroxide and the precipitation of calcium
carbonate by treatment with soda ash. The key to
obtaining high grade lithium is to use purified
lithium chloride and carrying out electrolysis in
the virtual absence of air and humidity to minimize
lithium’s rapid reactions. Impurities must be
removed, which may include sodium, calcium,
magnesium, as well as carbonate, sulfate and borate.
The process concentrates brines, either natural or
otherwise, containing lithium and other alkali and
alkaline metal halides to 2-7% of lithium content.
Most of the alkali or alkaline earth compounds are
removed by precipitation at a pH between 10.5 and
11.5. The pH is modified with recycled lithium
hydroxide, with removal of remaining magnesium and
by lithium carbonate and/or carbon dioxide which
produces calcium carbonate as a precipitate.
The concentration of lithium in
seawater is only 0.2 parts per million, making the
extraction of lithium from seawater impractical.
Although the total amount of lithium found in
seawater has been calculated as 2.5 x 10 14 kg it
would be difficult to extract given the low
concentration. Rather, geothermal sources of lithium
extraction are proving much more practical. The only
efficient method for precipitating lithium from
geothermal salts is through the use of aluminum
salts. Of greatest interest is that the highest
recovery of lithium occurs at a pH greater than 11.
No product other than activated alumina is able to
perform consistently at this high pH. In the
presence of activated alumina the pure lithium salts
get bound through adsorption, and are then released
with greater than 99% purity.
Given the transition to lithium
as a vehicle power source, there is a major emphasis
to improve battery performance and reduce weight.
The battery in the Chevy Volt weighs 288 pounds. Dr. Gerbrand Ceder and colleagues at MIT have
demonstrated that lithium iron phosphate can be
manipulated to allow for extremely rapid cathode
charging. Their work was sponsored by the National
Science Foundation through the Materials Research
Science and Engineering Centers program and the
Batteries for Advanced Transportation Program of the
US Department of Energy. This technology has already
been licensed to manufacturers such as A123 Systems
of Watertown, MA. When current is applied to charge
a cell, lithium ions are trapped at the anode
storage medium and move away from the cathode. When
the battery discharges and produces current the ions
then travel back to the cathode and produce current.
The time that it takes the lithium to move on and
off the cathode material is a rate limiting step.
Lithium ion phosphate forms a lattice that creates
small tunnels through which the lithium ions flow.
Ceder and colleagues created a lithium phosphate
glassy surface to coat these tunnels, which appear
to speed the transport time for the lithium ions to
move on and off the cathode. They published in
Nature that this method allows for discharge rates
which are two orders of magnitude greater than those
used in today’s lithium ion batteries. They go on to
state that if the electric power grid were available
an electric car with a 15kWh battery could be
charged in 5 minutes (180kWh). This would allow a
lithium ion battery to behave like an ultracapacitor.
Charging of electric batteries would need to be done
at a specialized public filling recharge stations, as
the charging of the lithium battery would require
the delivery of 750 amps using 240 volts of
alternating current (240 VAC). As a point of
reference, the standard household electrical service
for most entire homes is only 150-200 amps. However,
these quick charge stations will only be possible if
they can store energy the same way that an
electrical vehicle (EV) will, but with more powerful
batteries.
While this technology has been
discredited by Zaghib et al: Unsupported claims of
ultrafast charging of LiFeP04 Li-ion batteries,
Journal of Power Sources, Vol 194: 2, December 2009,
it is clear that the race is on for finding superior
lithium extrusion and purification technologies.
The implication is that battery
powered vehicles appear here to stay. There is going
to be a requirement for superior methods to purify
high grade lithium from geothermal and brine
sources, and activated alumina by working at pH
levels in excess of 11 appear to best fit the bill.
As is the case with other
applications, DAI has the highest quality in the
industry for specialty activated aluminas along with
its careful control of pore and particle sizes.
Therefore, this makes Dynamic Adsorbents's specialty
alumina the best choice for purifying lithium.
Alumina Main Page |
Back to Technical Info